Legal Opinion

Bailey v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 29, 2014No. 1:02-cv-01078Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WOLSKI, Judge.

This is an action brought pursuant to the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Plaintiff alleges that the United States, acting through the Army Corps of Engineers (the Corps), has so restricted his use of property as to have taken it without payment of just compensation. This regulatory takings claim concerns plaintiffs platted waterfront property, which he was in the process of selling for residential development. See Bailey v. United States, 78 Fed.Cl. 239, 241 (Fed.Cl.2007) (Bailey). In an earlier opinion the Court denied-in-part and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
John R. Sand & Gravel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
Transportation Co. v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.