Legal Opinion

Fassilis v. Esperdy

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 12, 1962No. Nos. 66-68, Dockets 26956-26958PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATERMAN, Circuit Judge.

The three plaintiffs, Fassilis, Castaldo, and Fevola, who entered the United States as crewmen, bring this consolidated appeal from orders entered in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York that granted motions for summary judgment made in each of their cases by the defendant District Director of Immigration.1

Appellant Fassilis last entered this country about January 29, 1960, with permission as a member of the crew of an arriving vessel to remain here for twenty-nine days and to depart on a ship different from the one on which he…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  3. Helvering v. GowranSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Duplex Printing Press Co. v. DeeringSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Vandenbark v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. FEDORENKOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1984
  2. ALARCONBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1992
  3. Athanasios Patsis, A/K/A Thomas Nickas v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
  4. Fassilis v. EsperdyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  5. Francesco Foti, A/K/A Frank Foti v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API