Legal Opinion

ALARCON

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1992No. ID 3184PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Interim Decision #3184 MATTER OF ALARCON In Deportation Proceedings A-27588330 Decided by Board July 13, 1992 (1) A respondent who has been convicted of two crimes involving moral turpitude not arising from a single scheme of criminal misconduct is inadmissible into the United States under section 212(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. 1182(a) (Supp. II 1990), and is thus ineligible for adjustment of status under section 245 of the Act,

8 U.S.C. § 1255

(Supp. II 1990), unless he is eligible for and should be granted a waiver of inadmissibility under section 212(h) of the Act.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Jordan v. De GeorgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Ziffrin, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. FLORESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1980
  5. LOKBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1981

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Catherine Torres v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. MONREALBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2001
  3. Ramirez-Alejandre v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. SORIANOBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996
  5. MENDEZBoard of Immigration Appeals · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API