Legal Opinion
City of Seattle v. Puget Sound Power & Light Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1926No. 4875PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.
This ease was before this court on a former appeal, where a full statement of the facts will be found. Puget Sound Power & Light Co. v. City of Seattle, 5 F.(2d) 393. As will appear from a reference to that case, the court below dismissed the complaint for want of equity, or because the plaintiff had a full, speedy, and adequate remedy at law; but this court held that the complaint stated a cause of action in equity, entitling the plaintiff to certain equitable relief, assuming the facts stated in the complaint to be true, and the decree was accordingly reversed, and the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- In Re Sanford Fork & Tool Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Ex Parte Sibbald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Thompson v. Maxwell Land Grant & Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Roberts v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- Supervisors v. KennicottSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alabama Power Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- Federal Reserve Bank v. Omaha Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Great Western Broadcasting Corporation, D/B/A Kxtv v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Luis L. Cervantes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Illinois Cent. R. v. CrailCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.