Legal Opinion
Tull v. Turek
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided December 29, 1958PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wolcott, Justice:
On October 7, 1948, the plaintiffs, husband and wife, entered into a written contract for the purchase from the defendant, Margaret V. Tull, of 1506 Broom Street, Wilmington, together with the business operated by her at that location known as “Tull Sanitarium”. The plaintiffs agreed to pay the sum of $70,000. The assets purchased specifically included the tangible assets and the good will of the business known as “Tull Sanitarium”. The plaintiffs were granted the exclusive right to use the name “Tull Sanitarium”.
The contract of sale, in paragraph 6, provided as follows:
“6.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wright v. ScottonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1923
- duPont v. duPontSupreme Court of Delaware · 1951
- Glanding v. Industrial Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1945
- Richard Paul, Inc. v. Union Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- Scotton v. WrightCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1922
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Holden v. Construction MacHinery CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1972
- Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Diebold Computer Leasing, Inc. v. Commercial Credit Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Kaplan v. Centex CorporationCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1971
- J. A. Jones Construction Co. v. City of DoverSuperior Court of Delaware · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.