Kobogum v. Jackson Iron Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Marquette. (Grant, J.) Dill filed to declare complainants’ rights in- a mining property, and secure a deed of the same, and for other relief. Defendant appeals from a decree granting the relief prayed for. The facts, and points of counsel passed upon by the Court, are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
This litigation is substantially the same that was once before this Court in the name of Jeremy Compo as complainant. 49 Mich. 39 (12 N. W. Rep. 901); 50 Id. 578 (16 N. W. Rep. 295). Mr. Compo having held the title of Charlotte Kobogum for her benefit, has reconveyed it to her, and the other complainants come in under the suggestion of this Court that they were necessary parties, and all now sue jointly. Except as to their title, there is no important, change in the Mcts. The circuit court for the county of Marquette gave a decree in favor of complainants, and defendant appeals.- As the facts…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- The Kansas IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- United States v. HollidaySupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Johnson v. Johnson's AdministratorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Yeaman v. Galveston City CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1914
- Begay v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- James v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Cyr v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Wells v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.