Legal Opinion

E.H. v. M.H.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1994No. Nos. 18020, 18227PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Justice.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY/ISSUES

This is an appeal from a June 2, 1992 divorce decree ordering MH (Stepfather) to pay child support for his two minor stepchildren, MAC and ARC. Stepfather further challenges the divorce court’s refusal to review a January 10, 1989 order terminating the natural father’s parental rights. We address the following:

I. Does adoption by estoppel exist in South Dakota?

II. Was the order terminating the natural father’s parental rights valid?

We decline to extend the doctrine of estop-pel under these facts and reverse. Issue II was addressed and affirmed in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Malcolm v. MalcolmSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Herndon v. HerndonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Gross v. GrossSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Miller v. MillerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  5. Nelson v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Crouse v. CrouseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. D. G. v. D. M. K.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Weinand v. WeinandNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People in Interest of BSSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In re the Termination of Parental Rights Over M.A.C.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API