In re H.S.F.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
This appeal stems from an order entered by the Cleveland County District Court, following a review hearing, changing primary physical custody of the minor child, H.S.F., from her father to her mother. Because we hold that the trial court's findings of fact do not support its conclusion of law that this change was in the minor child's best interests and because the disposition ordered by the court is not one authorized by statute, we reverse the trial court's order and remand this case for further proceedings.
Factual and Procedural History
The respondent father and H.S.F.'s mother…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Matter of HelmsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- In Re BurrusSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Matter of ShueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re H.S.F.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Ynclan v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- In re E.H.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- In re D.L.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Ynclan v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010