Legal Opinion
In re E.H.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided June 4, 2013No. COA13-273PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STROUD, Judge.
The Guardian ad Litem (GAL), representing the juveniles E.H. (“Eliot”) and N.H. (“Neil”),1 appeals from an order entered 25 October 2012 denying his Rule 60(b) motion for relief from the voluntary dismissal without prejudice filed by Buncombe County Department of Social Services (BCDSS) purporting to dismiss the juvenile petitions as to Eliot and Neil. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s order.
I. Background
On 24 May 2012, BCDSS filed juvenile petitions alleging that respondent-father had sexually abused Eliot and Neil. Before a hearing to adjudicate the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Russell Lee EbersoleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- Lemmerman v. A. T. Williams Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- In re L.O.K.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Carter Ex Rel. Carter v. ClowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
- McCarley v. McCarleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Clementine F. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Clementine F. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- In re E.H.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- In re N.J.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- In re S.M.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014