Cayanan v. Citi Holdings, Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND STAY ACTION
MICHAEL M. ANELLO, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Elsie Cayanan, Kimberly Baker, and Jesse McKay bring this putative class action for alleged violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. §§ 227 et seq. Defendants Citibank, N.A.; Citigroup, Inc.; and CitiFinancial Services, Inc., move to compel arbitration of Plaintiffs’ claims in separate, individual arbitrations, in accordance with agreements requiring individual arbitration of all claims related to Plaintiffs’ consumer credit accounts held by…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mounts v. Midland Funding LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2017
- Holcombe v. DIRECTV, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2016
- Brent Groeneweg v. Citibank NADistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2026
- Charles Franklin Bratten, III v. Citibank, N.A., et al.District Court, D. Maryland · 2026
- Du-Phillips v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2025
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.