State v. Seymour

WATHEN, Justice.

After a jury trial in the Superior Court (Cumberland County), defendant appeals from convictions for reckless conduct with the use of a dangerous weapon (17-A M.R. S.A. §§ 211,1252(4) (1983)) and for tampering with a witness (17-A M.R.S.A. § 454(1)(A)(1) (1983)). On appeal, he claims: (1) that with respect to Count I, the court erred in not instructing the jury that they must find that the automobile was intentionally used as a dangerous weapon; and (2) that with respect to Count II, there was insufficient evidence for the jury to find him guilty of tampering with a witness.…