State v. York

[¶ 1] David York appeals from the judgments of conviction entered in the Superi- or Court (Cumberland County, Mills, J.) after a jury found him guilty of reckless conduct with the use of a dangerous weapon (Class C), 17-A M.R.S. § 211 (2005), and criminal threatening (Class D), 17-A M.R.S. § 209 (2005). York contends, inter alia, that there was insufficient evidence to convict him of both charges.1 We are unpersuaded by York’s contentions and affirm the judgments.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] When viewed in the light most favorable to the State, see State v. Bouchard, 2005 ME 106, ¶10, 881 A.2d 1130,…