Legal Opinion

People v. Tyren

California Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1919No. Crim. No. 2201PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Sacramento County, and from an order denying a new trial. Malcolm C. Glenn, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The defendant was convicted of murder of the first degree and sentenced to death. He appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The only defense sought to be made at the trial was that of insanity. No question is, or could be, made of the sufficiency of the evidence to establish the commission of the homicide by the defendant. It is conceded, as well, that the jury was warranted in finding against the plea of insanity. The appeal is rested upon the claim of error in the conduct of the trial. Por a proper understanding of the points made, a brief outline of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. GallagherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. CreeksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. People v. SchaferCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. KynetteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. People v. DotsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. People v. KennedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API