Dale E. Schardt v. Alice Payne
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCÓN, Senior Circuit Judge.
We must decide in this matter the novel question whether a Washington state prisoner may challenge the'validity of his sentence retroactively on the ground that the trial .court based its sentencing decision on facts that were not found to be true by a jury in -violation of the constitutional principle subsequently announced by the United States Supreme Court in Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296, 124 S.Ct, 2531, 159 L.Ed.2d 403 (2004). We conclude that Blakely does not apply retroactively to convictions that became final prior to its publication. We also hold…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by85 opinions
- Butler v. CurryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Scott v. SchriroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Susana CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- People v. WenzingerColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re GomezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.