Legal Opinion

Crooks v. Pittsburg Railways Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1907No. Appeal, No. 74PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal, No. 74, Oct. T., 1906, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., June T., 1903, No. 653, on verdict for plaintiff in case of Marie B. Crooks v. Pittsburg Railways Company. Trespass to recover damages for death of plaintiff’s husband. Before Brown, J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Verdict and judgment for $7,913.56. Defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Potter,

This was an action of trespass brought by Marie B. Crooks *591against the Pittsburg Railways Company, to recover damages for the death of her husband, Everett E. Crooks, who was run over and killed by one of defendant’s cars, on East street in the city of Allegheny, about ten o’clock on the evening of February 19, 1905.

Mr. and Mrs. Crooks had been spending the evening at the house of a friend on East street. It was their intention to return home by a trolley car running south on that street. It appears from the evidence that the cars made sufficient noise in passing,…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Autio v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Flynn v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Patton v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Cunningham v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  5. Schuchalter v. P. R. T. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API