Legal Opinion
Witherspoon v. Teton Laser Center, LLC
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 2007No. 06-11PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[¶1] Christine Witherspoon (Wither-spoon) filed an action alleging that Dr. Maura Lofaro and Teton Laser Center, LLC (collectively the Defendants) had negligently administered an intense pulsed light (IPL) hair removal treatment causing her to suffer burning and scarring. The parties entered into a stipulation allowing Witherspoon's designated expert witness to testify by telephone. After the expert's testimony at trial, the Defendants alleged that Witherspoon had violated the terms of the stipulation and requested that the expert's testimony be strick en. The district court…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- ABC Builders, Inc. v. PhillipsWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Grabill v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Sanville v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Harris v. GrizzleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Dewey v. WentlandWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brenda Miller, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Connie Rae ScribnerWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
- Magner v. BrinkmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Maverick Benefit Advisors, LLC Mountain Benefit Associates, LLC Taylor H. Haynes and Elisabeth A. Wasson v. David J. Bostrom Bostrom Enterprises, LLC and Mountain States Review, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2016
- Eog Resources, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Jjlm Land, Llc, a Wyoming Limited Liability CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2022
- Ob-Gyn Associates of Northern Indiana, P.C. v. RansbottomIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.