Sanville v. State

RAPER, Chief Justice.

The principal issues in this case involve an application of the concepts of opening the door to ordinarily inadmissible evidence and invited error. The appellant-defendant was convicted of one count of obtaining money by false pretenses in violation of § 6-3-106, W.S.1977, 1 and one count of delivering a fraudulent check in violation of § 6-3-110, W.S.1977. 2 He was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of not less than two years nor more than five years on the former conviction and six-months imprisonment on the latter, the sentences to run concurrently. He appeals the…