In the Matter of the Sanction of Jay C. Baker and Michael J. Carson, George Roland Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc. v. Ed Dietlin, D/B/A Dietlin Aircraft, Third Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
744 F.2d 1438
40 Fed.R.Serv.2d 171
In the Matter of the Sanction of Jay C. BAKER and Michael J.
Carson, Appellants.
George Roland MULVANEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RIVAIR FLYING SERVICE, INC., Defendant,
v.
Ed DIETLIN, d/b/a Dietlin Aircraft, Third Party Defendant-Appellant.
No. 83-1246.
United States Court of Appeals,
Tenth Circuit.
Oct. 3, 1984.
Jay C. Baker, Baker & Baker, Tulsa, Okl., and Michael J. Carson, Gann, Yeksavich, Carson & Leonard, Tulsa, Okl., filed a brief for appellants.
Before HOLLOWAY, SETH, BARRETT, DOYLE, McKAY, LOGAN, SEYMOUR and McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION ON REHEARING EN BANC
M…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Gus O. Hollis, Maxine Hollis, and Jean Walsh Quinnett v. The United States of America, Independent Petroleum Association of America, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by118 opinions
- Kenneth Ray Meade v. Grubbs, Badge No. 128, Individually and as a Deputy Sheriff of the County of OklahomaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Ocelot Oil Corporation v. Sparrow IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Ehrenhaus v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- G. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Braley v. CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
113 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.