Legal Opinion
Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 3, 1984No. 83-1246PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion
OPINION ON REHEARING EN BANC
McKAY, Circuit Judge.
After the panel decision in this case, the court determined to consider en banc some of the growing number of sanctions cases. We therefore ordered the recall of the mandate and here consider the issues raised in this case en banc along with D & H Marketers, Inc. v. Freedom Oil & Gas, Inc., 744 F.2d 1443 (10th Cir.1984), also decided today.
The case out of which this appeal arises was set for trial on January 17, 1983. Not long before trial, the defendant in this three-party action sought a continuance for the convenience of counsel. The court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Gus O. Hollis, Maxine Hollis, and Jean Walsh Quinnett v. The United States of America, Independent Petroleum Association of America, Amici CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
3Cited by78 opinions
- In the Matter of the Sanction of Jay C. Baker and Michael J. Carson, George Roland Mulvaney v. Rivair Flying Service, Inc. v. Ed Dietlin, D/B/A Dietlin Aircraft, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Charbono v. Sumski (In Re Charbono)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- In re Engle CasesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2017
- Perez v. Denver Fire DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2017
- S&T Bank v. Daniel Groskop, as Trustee of the Black Diamond Liquidating Litigation TrustWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.