Legal Opinion

Bank of Wilber v. Freeburg

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1911No. 16,877PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Republic district court.

1Opinion of the Court

*236The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This action was brought by the bank to recover a judgment on a note given by the defendant. There was evidence which tended to show that the note-arose out of the following transaction: Swanson and Claflin ordered one sixteen-horsepower Huber traction engine of the Huber Manufacturing Company, of Marion, Ohio, through the defendant, the local agent for the 'Huber company at Scandia, Kan. The order on the part of the company was executed by C. E. Miller,, as agent, and by Swanson and Claflin, the purchasers, and contained a contract of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Potts v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  2. Brothers v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Grubb v. SargentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Boeck v. Katz Drug Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1942
  5. Drysdale v. WetzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API