Legal Opinion

Drysdale v. Wetz

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 9, 1918No. 21,403PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Barber district court; George L. Hay, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Porter, J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover actual and exemplary damages for an assault and battery, alleging that the defendants unlawfully conspired to assault and beat him. The jury returned a verdict in his favor for $1,000, upon which judgment was rendered, and the defendants appeal.

Fred Wetz filed a separate answer admitting that he had struck the plaintiff, but alleged provocation by plaintiff’s insults and threats. Separate answers were filed by the other *681two defendants denying any conspiracy or participation in thé assault.

William Wetz is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schaap v. HayesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Bank of Wilber v. FreeburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Buehler v. TeetorSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. EmorySupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Hutson ex rel. Templar v. Imperial Royalties Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  3. State v. AddingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API