Legal Opinion

Cherry v. Abbott

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 22, 1988No. 45882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Gregory, Justice.

Petitioner, a black male, filed a writ of habeas corpus contending the state had exercised its peremptory strikes to exclude all black jurors from the panel selected to try his case, and therefore his convictions were in violation of Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U. S. 79 (106 SC 1712, 90 LE2d 69) (1986). Batson had not been decided at the time of petitioner’s trial. 1 Petitioner’s trial counsel made no objections to the state’s use of its peremptory strikes against all three black members of the panel. In his petition for habeas corpus, petitioner also alleged that trial counsel…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Alexander v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gregory v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Davis v. TurpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. Davis v. TurpinSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  4. Gregory v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API