Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. Turpin

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 13, 2000No. S00A0993Published

1DissentBenham, Chief Justice

I respectfully disagree with the majority’s decision to affirm the habeas court’s ruling that Davis is procedurally barred from pursuing his habeas claim that electrocution is cruel and unusual punishment under the Georgia and United States constitutions. For the reasons that follow, I would vacate that portion of the habeas court’s order denying Davis’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus insofar as the order concluded that Davis was procedurally barred from pursuing his claim that execution by electrocution is cruel and unusual punishment, and remand the case for further proceedings.

It is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCleskey v. ZantSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Penry v. LynaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Trop v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Stanford v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Fleming v. ZantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API