Legal Opinion

In Re Ault

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2000No. 70S00-9608-DI-525PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

By neglecting clients’ legal affairs, purposefully submitting to courts proposed orders which did not accurately reflect the courts’ rulings, and knowingly pursuing a cause of action in courts without jurisdiction to entertain the action, attorney Kevin W. Ault engaged in professional misconduct. We find today that his actions warrant suspension from the practice of law.

This case was heard by a duly-appointed hearing officer upon the Disciplinary Commission’s four-count Amended Verified Complaint for Disciplinary Action. It is now before us upon that hearing officer’s report, which finds…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Matter of FroschIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Cook v. WozniakIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Cook v. WozniakIndiana Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Watson v. Auto Advisors, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Hara v. ReichertNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Janet Freels v. James F. Koches and Sunset Builders, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Geico Insurance Company, as subrogee of Ralph Heitkamp v. Dianna GrahamIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. Hawkins v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API