Legal Opinion

Sonnenberg v. Sonnenberg

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 2010No. 20090353PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Priscilla Sonnenberg, n/k/a Priscilla Sauer, appeals from an amended order and judgment. We hold the district court erred as a matter of law by failing to comply with the child support guidelines and reverse and remand the court’s calculation of the parties’ child support obligations. We affirm the district court’s denial of attorney fees.

I

[¶ 2] Sauer and Terry Sonnenberg married in 1993 and have two children together, J.S. and K.S. The parties di*656vorced in 2002. In accordance with the parties’ stipulation, the district court entered a divorce judgment awarding Sauer…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Buchholz v. BuchholzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Heinle v. HeinleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Bertsch v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Dronen v. DronenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Entzie v. EntzieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Stephenson v. StephensonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Larson v. LarsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Krueger v. KruegerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API