Legal Opinion
Young v. Nichols
Washington Supreme Court
Decided May 23, 1929No. 21606. Department OnePublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
Court C of the city of Tacoma, is a public street of that city, forty feet in width, extending in a northerly and southerly direction. It is crossed at right angles by numerous streets, running in an easterly and westerly direction. Blocks 1106 and 1107 lie between Eleventh street and Thirteenth street of such cross streets, and face upon the court named. The appellants Nichols and wife are the owners of the lots numbered from one to six in block 1107, lot one paralleling upon Eleventh street and the others ex tending southerly therefrom. The tract so owned forms a rectangle one hundred and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smith v. City of CentraliaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Reed v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Fry v. O'LearyWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Motoramp Garage Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Brazell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- CAPITOL HILL METH. CH. OF SEATTLE v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Puget Sound Alumni of Kappa Sigma, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- London v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Yarrow First Associates v. Town of Clyde HillWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Hoskins v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.