Legal Opinion

Onkels v. Stogsdill

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1929No. 21674. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendants on account of injuries suffered by bim and damage to bis automobile, as -tbe result of a collision with defendants’ automobile, tbe circumstances surrounding tbe accident being as follows: Plaintiff resides on the west side of the “North Trunk Boad” between Seattle and Everett. A private roadway leads from his garage to the highway, which it reaches about three hundred feet south of a cross road. In front of plaintiff’s property, the highway is approximately ninety feet wide, the paved portion thereof being approximately twenty feet in width.

On…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dahlstrom v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Keller v. WaddingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Sherrill v. Olympic Ice Cream Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Webber v. Park Auto Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Hirst v. Standard Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sandberg v. SpoelstraWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Esponette v. WisemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
  3. Tyler v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Bell v. Northwest Cities Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Glick v. RopesWashington Supreme Court · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API