Onkels v. Stogsdill
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBeals, J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendants on account of injuries suffered by bim and damage to bis automobile, as -tbe result of a collision with defendants’ automobile, tbe circumstances surrounding tbe accident being as follows: Plaintiff resides on the west side of the “North Trunk Boad” between Seattle and Everett. A private roadway leads from his garage to the highway, which it reaches about three hundred feet south of a cross road. In front of plaintiff’s property, the highway is approximately ninety feet wide, the paved portion thereof being approximately twenty feet in width.
On…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dahlstrom v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
- Keller v. WaddingtonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Sherrill v. Olympic Ice Cream Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
- Webber v. Park Auto Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926
- Hirst v. Standard Oil Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sandberg v. SpoelstraWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Esponette v. WisemanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931
- Tyler v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Bell v. Northwest Cities Gas Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- Glick v. RopesWashington Supreme Court · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.