Legal Opinion

Haas v. Fitzpatrick

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 21, 1934No. Appeal 130PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Panker, J.,

The plaintiff obtained a judgment in an action of trespass brought against his wife’s father to recover damages for the alienation of the affections of the plaintiff’s wife. In this appeal the assignments of error concern the right to a judgment n. o. v., or to a new trial.

In view of the conclusions at which we have arrived, we will first consider the assignments of error supporting the defendant’s right to a new trial. He assigns as error in this particular the receipt over his objection of a portion of plaintiff’s testimony, which it is asserted attacked the character…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Canole v. AllenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  2. Ulrich's CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  3. Cornelius v. HambaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  4. Stewart v. HagertySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  5. Bell v. ThroopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Novic v. FenicsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Commonwealth v. PearlmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Commonwealth v. Marker, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1982
  4. Sernovits v. Roberts, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API