Legal Opinion

Wiggins v. Dojcsan

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 12, 1982No. 81-533PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

411 So.2d 894 (1982)

Daniel L. WIGGINS, Sr. and Gloria H. Wiggins, Appellants,

v.

John DOJCSAN and Veronica Dojcsan, Appellees.

No. 81-533.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 12, 1982.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1982.

Louis X. Amato of MacLean, Amato & Arlen, Naples, for appellants.

Louis S. Erickson, Naples, for appellees.

RYDER, Judge.

Daniel and Gloria Wiggins appeal the order denying their motion to quash service of process and to strike the lis pendens. We affirm.

Appellees' first amended complaint stated that it was an action quasi in rem directed against real property…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Shaffer v. HeitnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Hess v. PawloskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lake Placid Holding Co. v. PaparoneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Tortu v. TortuDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Bailey v. HoughSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  4. Hough v. StewartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Birsky v. BarnesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API