Legal Opinion

King v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the comity court of Madison. Tried before tbe Hon. Thomas J". Taylor.

1Opinion of the CourtHead, J.

Most of tbe exceptions reserved, botb as to tbe evidence and instructions, are so manifestly without merit, we will not take tbe time to point out tbeir infirmities. It would serve no useful purpose to do so.

"Wben remarks of counsel, in addressing tbe jury are thought to be out of place and prejudicial to tbe opposite party, tbe court should be moved to exclude them. It is not sufficient, in order to have tbe matter passed upon by this court, to merely express objection to the- remarks without invoking action on tbe part of tbe court. We review tbe rulings of tbe court only. In tbe present…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. City of South Bend v. TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Lide v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1901
  4. Murphy v. Southern Pacific Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1909
  5. May v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1905

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API