Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1893PublishedCited by 14 opinions

EbOM the City Court of Montgomery. Tried before tbe Hon. Thomas M. Ábbington.

1Opinion of the CourtHead, J.

The constituents of the offense of night walking, with which defendant is charged, made essential by the averments of the present indictment, are that defendant “was a common night walker, and did walk and ramble in the streets and common highways in the city of Montgomery, Alabama, at unseasonable hours of night, without having any lawful business and without any necessity therefor, for the unlawful purpose of picking up men for lewd intercourse, against good morals and good manners, to the common nuisance of all good people of said county.” Stokes v. State, 92 Ala. 73.

The only evidence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clarke v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  2. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  3. Stokes v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Banks v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  2. Thompson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. State v. BondIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1902

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API