Legal Opinion

Fort Belknap Indian Community v. Mazurek

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 16, 1994No. 93-36086PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

43 F.3d 428

The FORT BELKNAP INDIAN COMMUNITY OF the FORT BELKNAP INDIAN

RESERVATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Joseph P. MAZUREK, as Attorney General for the State of

Montana; Donald A. Ranstrom, as County Attorney

for Blaine County, Montana, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 93-36086.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Nov. 3, 1994.

Decided Dec. 16, 1994.

Deanne L. Sandholm and Harley R. Harris, Asst. Attys. Gen., Helena, MT, for defendants-appellants.

James L. Vogel, Vogel Law Office, Hardin, MT, for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Newport Beach CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. New York State Department of Taxation v. St. Regis GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. In re 1,750 Cases of LiquorNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  4. AT&T Corp. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API