Legal Opinion
Martinez v. Newport Beach City
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 10, 1997No. 95-56866PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
Appellant Phillip Martinez appeals pro se the district court’s summary judgment in favor of Appellee Municipal Court Judge Robison and the court’s dismissal of Martinez’s § 1983 action against the City of Newport Beach et al. Martinez’s § 1983 cause of action arose out of a dispute with a neighbor that led to his arrest by the Newport Beach Police Department and the revocation of his parole on a federal sentence. Martinez alleges that Appellees violated his constitutional rights by conspiring to imprison him.
I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Martinez was arrested in…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a California Corporation v. City of Lodi, California, Jack Sieglock, in His Capacity as Mayor of the City of Lodi Richard Prima, Jr., in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650 Randall A. Hays, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi City Attorney Michael C. Donovan, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Adam L. Babich, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Steven H. Doto, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Bret A. Stone, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney John R. Till, Individually and in His Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorney Zevnik, Horton, Guibord and McGovern Llp, Individually and in Their Capacity as Lodi Assistant City Attorneys Fran E. Forkas, in His Capacity as Enforcing Officer of Lodi Ordinance No. 1650, Unigard Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation Unigard Security Insurance Company, a Washington Corporation v. City of LodiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Gilbertson v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- YAKAMA INDIAN NATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Wizards of the Coast LLC v. Cryptozoic Entertainment LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.