Legal Opinion
State v. Roberts
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided September 2, 1987No. 86-779PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHerbert R. Brown, J.
In Miranda v. Arizona (1966), 384 U.S. 436, 478, 479, the United States Supreme Court held:
“* * * [T]hat when an individual is taken into custody or otherwise deprived of his freedom by the authorities in any significant way and is subjected to questioning, the privilege against self-incrimination is jeopardized. Procedural safeguards must be employed to protect the privilege, and unless other fully effective means are adopted to notify the person of his right of silence and to assure that the exercise of the right will be scrupulously honored, the following measures are required. He must be…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Oregon v. MathiasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. TreeshOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. PowellOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ThompsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CooeyOhio Supreme Court · 1989
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.