Legal Opinion

Millcreek Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 5, 2000PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NARICK, Senior Judge.

Millcreek Township (Township) appeals from an order of the Public Utility Commission (PUC) that denied the Township’s exceptions to the recommended decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ). The Township presents three issues for our review. First, whether PUC committed an abuse of discretion by making factual determinations not supported by substantial evidence; second, whether PUC’s action violates the State Highway Law (Highway Law)1; and third, whether PUC erroneously interpreted the agreements between the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT) and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Greene Township Board of Supervisors v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. At & T v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. AT&T v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wheeling & Lake Erie Railway Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Reading Blue Mountain & Norther Railroad Co. v. PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API