AT&T v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
PELLEGRINI, Judge.
AT&T and Sprint Communications Company L.P. (Sprint)1 appeal an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Commission)2 denying them reimbursement *982of their costs for relocating fiber optic cables at five rail-highway crossings.3
I
This case emanates from the need by Delaware and Hudson Railway Company, Inc. (Delaware and Hudson) to lower railroad tracks at a number of rail-highway crossings in northeastern Pennsylvania to accommodate double stack container railroad cars. Because the Pennsylvania General Assembly wanted to promote commerce within the Commonwealth by…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kelly v. ZamarelloAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
- Uniontown Area School District v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Bethenergy Mines Inc. v. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental ProtectionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- City of Philadelphia v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Millcreek Township v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000