Legal Opinion

State v. Clemence

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided November 9, 2006No. 92,114, 92,883PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Greene, J.:

Todd Eugene Clemence appeals his convictions for the manufacture of methamphetamine, possession of methamphetamine with intent to sell, felony possession of drug paraphernalia, possession of methamphetamine without a drug tax stamp, and misdemeanor possession of drug paraphernalia, arguing numerous trial and sentencing errors together with a claim that his speedy trial rights were violated. We agree with Clemence as to his speedy trial argument, and we therefore reverse his convictions and order that he be discharged.

Factual and Procedural Background

The rather tortured path from…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. Cuezze, Houston & FalticoSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. State v. RiveraSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
  4. State v. SandersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. State v. RoyalSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. QueenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
  2. State v. GillCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. State v. QueenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API