Legal Opinion

State v. Gill

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 17, 2012No. 106,388PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Standridge, J.:

The district court dismissed a felony theft charge against David Allen Gill, II, based on its finding that the State violated Gill’s right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. On appeal, the State argues the facts in this case do not support the district court’s decision in this regard. We are persuaded by the State’s argument and therefore reverse the order of dismissal and remand with directions to reinstate the felony theft charge against Gill.

Facts

On July 11, 2008, Kirstin Nelson complained to Topeka police that her ex-boyfriend,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. Janice Wallace, United States of America v. Elmore PennCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Anthony R. Colombo and Joseph Colombo, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Maine v. Nicholas W. NorrisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2023
  2. People v. NelsonColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
  4. State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API