Legal Opinion

State v. Queen

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 19, 2021No. 120643Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 120,643 STATE OF KANSAS. Appellee, v. DANNY W. QUEEN, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. Under the facts here, where a district court judge mistakenly set a trial beyond the speedy trial time set in K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 22-3402, the judge did not cite the need to do so because of a crowded docket, and no party requested nor did the court order a continuance, the crowded docket exception of K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 22-3402(e)(4) does not apply to extend the speedy trial deadline. 2. Under the facts here, a defendant did not waive speedy trial rights or…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. KeelSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. GodfreySupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  4. Hodges v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API