United States v. Dell
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
In this direct criminal appeal, Paul Jay Dell argues that the district court erred in calculating his sentencing guideline range by counting a plea in abeyance as a prior conviction for purposes of U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(a)(4)(A). We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3742(a)(2) and 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and AFFIRM.
I
In October 2002, Dell was convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) and possession of a stolen firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(j). Following these convictions, the probation office prepared a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. FortierCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. TagoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. HinesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. WootenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Meza v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2015
- United States v. Alonzo L. Plakio, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.