Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1873No. 10,055PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of San-Bernardino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Belcher, J.:

The defendant is accused by the indictment of the “ crime of assault with intent to do bodily harm upon the person of another.” • This, in effect, designates the offense as a simple assault. (People v. Vanard, 6 Cal. 562; Ex parte Ah Cha, 40 Cal. 426) The particular acts constituting the offense charged are that the defendant, at a time and place named, under circumstances showing an abandoned and malignant heart, and without just cause or excuse, violently, forcibly and at great speed, directed, reined, and guided a horse, which he was riding, towards and in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. VanardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856
  2. Ex parte Ah ChaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
  3. People v. Ah OwnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McKenzie v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894
  2. Territory v. ConradSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1877
  3. Pueblo v. ZambranaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912
  4. People v. ZambranaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API