Legal Opinion

In re Pelletier

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 30, 2014No. 607,2013PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney disciplinary matter involving Dan C. Pelletier’s (“Pelletier”) unauthorized practice of law in Delaware. In a report dated October 31, 2013 (the “Report”), the Board on Professional Responsibility (the “Board”) found that Pelle-tier engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in Delaware in violation of the Delaware Lawyers’ Rules of Professional Conduct (the “Rules”) and recommended Pel-letier be publicly reprimanded. The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (the “ODC”) objects to the Board’s recommended sanction and argues that a one-year suspension be imposed. We agree with…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re AbbottSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  2. In Re FroelichSupreme Court of Delaware · 2003
  3. In Re TonweSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  4. In re NadelSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
  5. In Re MartinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware: MartinSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  2. In Re a Member of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Delaware: KoysteSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  3. Abbott v. AaronsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
  4. Abbott v. Delaware State Public Integrity CommissionSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API