Legal Opinion
United States v. Shayota
District Court, N.D. California
Decided May 13, 2016No. Case No. 15-CR-00264-LHKPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE
LUCY H. KOH, United States District Judge
On March 23, 2016, defendants Mario Ramirez and Camilo Ramirez (the “Ra-mirezes”) filed a Motion to Suppress Evidence (“Motion”), ECF No. 112, joined by defendant Walid Jamil, ECF No. 120. The Government filed an Opposition. ECF No. 133. The Ramirezes filed a Reply. ECF No. 138.
The Court held a hearing on the Motion on May 13, 2016. Having considered the parties’ submissions, argument, the record in this case, and the relevant law, the Court DENIES the Motion to Suppress.
I. BACKGROUND
A three-count indictment was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Stanley Mills StanertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. StanertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- In Re Lorillard Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.