State v. Handsome
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
COPELAND, Justice.
By his tenth assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial judge erred in giving him separate and consecutive sentences for the armed robbery and kidnapping of George Bryant.
Defendant concedes in his brief that this Court’s decision in State v. Williams, 295 N.C. 655, 249 S.E. 2d 709 (1978), is dispositive of this issue. It is not necessary to prove the completed offense of armed robbery as a part of proving the offense of kidnapping. Under G.S. 14-39 it is necessary to prove that the confinement, restraint, or removal is for the purpose of, among other…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. FulcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. BruceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. BrowerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Pueblo v. Echevarría RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1991
- State v. FieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. HagemanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
- State v. RasorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.