Legal Opinion
State v. Briggs
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 1970No. 433PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge.
Convicted of burglary, § 40A-16-3, N. M.S.A.1953 (Repl.Vol. 6), defendant appeals. Defendant contended at trial, and renews the contention here, that testimony as to his oral incriminating statements should not have been admitted. The issues: (1) the adequacy of the Miranda warnings (Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694, 10 A.L.R.3d 974 (1966)), and (2) whether the State proved that defendant waived his right to have counsel present when questioned.
Adequacy of the warnings.
In advising defendant of his various rights, the District Attorney informed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. AullNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. LewisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969
- State v. SneedNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BoeglinNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. RamirezNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- The PEOPLE v. ParksIllinois Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. BurkNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
- State v. HarrisonNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.