Legal Opinion
Geraci v. Eckankar
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 17, 1995No. CX-94-1506PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Carol A. Geraci appeals from the partial summary judgment, arguing that the district court erred in (1) granting summary judgment on her terms and conditions gender discrimination claim, defamation claim, and promissory estoppel claim because there were genuine issues of material fact; (2) concluding that the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 16 of the Minnesota Constitution insulates a religious employer from discharge-based claims brought by a non-minister; and (3) refusing to allow her to discover evidence of pretext for her…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Milkovich v. Lorain Journal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. MilivojevichSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Ohio Civil Rights Commission v. Dayton Christian Schools, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Charles Waters v. B. MadsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Jeffrey Sherman v. Rinchem Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Karen Chambers v. The Travelers CompaniesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Tanya J. Fjelsta v. Zogg Dermatology, PlcCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- McClure v. American Family Mut. Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.