Legal Opinion

Thomas Anderson v. Charles Warner County of Mendocino County of Mendocino Sheriff's Department

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 2006No. 04-15505PublishedCited by 716 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM A. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge.

In this § 1983 suit, Thomas Anderson appeals from the district court’s grant of summary judgment to individual defendant Charles Warner, as well as defendants Mendocino County Sheriffs Office and County of Mendocino (collectively “the County”). Anderson contends that Warner assaulted him while acting under color of state law. Anderson also contends that the County negligently hired and supervised Warner, and conducted an inadequate investigation into the assault by Warner. We reverse as to Warner and affirm as to the County.

I. Background

On the morning of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by716 opinions

  1. Nadia Naffe v. John FreyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Edgerly v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Hyun Park v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  4. Blair v. Bethel School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Kenneth Rawson v. Recovery Innovations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

711 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API