Legal Opinion

(1997)

Maryland Attorney General Reports

Decided August 21, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Sheriff Peppersack:

You have requested our opinion whether members of the Sheriff's Office have the authority to enter private property in "gated communities" in order to serve legal process in a civil proceeding.1 Our opinion is that an officer may not use force, threat of force, or threat of arrest to gain entry.

If a deputy sheriff cannot gain entry into a gated community to serve process, the appropriate response will vary, depending on the nature of the process and the circumstances that prevented entry. If the process in question is a summons issued after the filing of a complaint,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. F. I. duPont, Glore Forgan & Co. v. ChenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. United States v. Wilber N. Olander, William Dolman, Denne M. Harrington, Gary D. Rondeau, Gerald L. Minnich, Arthur Schruder, and Roy D. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Bein v. Brechtel-Jochim Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  4. Casselman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Quann v. Whitegate-EdgewaterDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API