Casselman v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
GARRARD, Judge.
After a bench trial Gerald Casselman was convicted of resisting law enforeement, a Class A misdemeanor. Our consideration of the first issue raised by Cassel-man attacking the sufficiency of the evidence requires that we reverse his conviction.1
When reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction we consider only the evidence most favorable to the state and all reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom. If there is substantial evidence of probative value to support each element of the offense, then we will affirm the trial court. Napier v. State (1983),…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Miller v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Ashton v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by56 opinions
- Armstrong v. SquadritoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Armstrong v. SquadritoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- State v. WiegmannCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Shoultz v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Row v. HoltIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.