Legal Opinion

Moore v. Hatfield

New York County Courts

Decided March 15, 1911PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for interlocutory judgment in an action for partition and to confirm report of referee.

1Opinion of the CourtNiemann, J.

Motion for interlocutory judgment, in an action for partition, upon the report of a referee to take proof of title, etc. The referee has reported that, in his opinion, the greater portion of the premises designated in the complaint is so circumstanced that actual partition thereof can be had without great prejudice to the owners, and that the remaining portion should be sold. An exception to this finding has been filed by the plaintiff. The guardian ad litem for the defendant John B. Murtagh moves to confirm said report.

*284The premises in question consist of about one acre of land, situate on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Porter v. . WaringNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  2. Smith v. SmithNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. Chittenden v. GatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  4. Clason v. ClasonNew York Court of Chancery · 1837
  5. Haywood v. JudsonNew York Supreme Court · 1848

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Partrick v. PreiserNew York Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API